Iran Emerging As a Global Player to Participate in International Politics – Evaluate Iranian Role
Arshin Adib-Moghaddam has reinvented Iran in international political arena. His theories and innovative ideas must highlight the certain agendas and vision of Tehran to promote its objectives and vision. He rediscovers the role of Tehran in global politics by analyzing series of incidents, facts and historical evidences. Episode of post revolution in Iran is a benchmark to assess Tehran’s roles in global diplomacy and international politics.
Iran Passing through Change - Phase of Innovation - More Constructive Approach
A massive change in Iran remodeled the Iranian society uber. To be frank, the romantic imperialism theory has been transported into the modern generation even after the revolution. Iraq and Iran have met at battle field to ensure their existence in ME. Arab World has to be occupied by Tehran to have more political power. Iranian attitude for becoming imperial and strong has been criticized by Shariati groups. Al-e Ahmad also lambasts the approach of Iranian government to support Pahlavi or highly utopian imperialistic temperament to prioritize the value of Aryans to rule the world. Al-e Ahmad states that Iran must not showcase excessive dependency on western nations. So, new zones of dispute have given a jolt to Iranian politics to survive. Pahlavis theory prioritizes the ideology of Persian monarchy. It never supports Islam or Arab to control the society of Iran. In this regard, Arshin Adib reiterates that the struggle between pan Islamic community and the social reformists is not by product of the innovation or social change. Saddam Hussain had the plan to annex Tehran to Baghdad for accelerating supremacy over the gulf region. This tyrant had had determination to deactivate Iranian government for expanding his hands to manipulate other gulf regions. On the other hand, conflict between progressive Islamic society and fundamental pan-Islamic community members obviously increases the possibility of proper identification of Muslims in Tehran. Adib meticulously probed to handpick some important materials to find the different causes of Iraq’s invasion to defeat Iranian government. According to this think tank, perception of Saddam was influenced by Ba’athist supporters to control Tehran for different reasons. It was not a war with Muslim communities but it was a jihad to fight with Persians to establish the pan Islamic regime in the country. There was a Khaliphet movement to bring a rapid transformation in the Iranian political field. Saddam was not pleased when he came to learn the steady progression of Iran to claim more political dominance. It was a possible threat to Iraq and therefore, Saddam felt it most urgent to invade Iran. It is a hidden enmity involving Shia and Sunni to go for bloodshed war. Arshin Adib’s next evaluation is little bit more anti-Islamic condemning America for separating Iran from the global politics. In USA, neo conservatives and alternative right wings have not showcased softness at the time of analyzing the role of Tehran in international political school. America believes that Iran is a growing problem to West because of the power formation to the radical force removing the feasibility of progression in the country. At present, Iranian society is led by few radical elements who are jihadists to destruct the whole world. It is a type of pan-Islamic force with the sole purpose of establishing monopoly power discarding the rights of other religious schools. Ideologies of American neo-conservatists are not favorable to Iran. So- called institutionalism nurtures the ground for ethnic clash in Iran. Many elite members, political big brothers and critics join the neo-conservative groups to spot Iran from a different angle. This institutional force is definitely an inflammable component to separate Iranian political leaders from the rest of the world. In between, alternative right group in America lower the value of Muslims. Donald Trump has also been suspected to be a member of this white supremacy organization. His aggressive feedbacks against Islamic organizations in ME must not be a sedative to Iran as well. The impact of the innovation influences even Iranian think tanks, women activists and educated society to take different routes for tackling this misconception nourished by Western leaders. Abidi predicts that Iranian intellectuals and elite people try to emulate pluralism theory to keep in touch with modern innovation process in Iran.
Rouhani’s Plurralistic Theory for More Liberty- Iran Ensures Its Presence in Global Politics
Political structure In Iran was modified through different steps. Arrival of Sorbonne elite class and bootlickers of Ayatollah Khomeini wanted to make Iranians economically independent. The first preference for economic liberty without reliance on West was also seconded by Mehdi Bazargan , the prime minister of Iran and Abol Hassan Bani Sadi. Ayatollah Motahhari, the famous political critic, also explained the importance of restoration of sound economy of Iran without subjection to foreign political power. There will be a new liberty in the society which must concentrate on the economic independence and progression in all financial sectors to make Iran one of the global players in the international platform.. Rouhani, the pinnacle in Iran, clarified his standpoint at Davos conference over the issue of nuclear deal and economic freedom to liberate the small scale industry from obligations. Iran will utilize uranium for recycling nuclear energy. It will be capable of generating nuclear energy for growth and Iran also manufactures nuke systems for self-protection. Instead of opting for neo liberal economic “infitah”, there will be a possible conglomerate to materialize the mixed economy concepts to upgrade the social structure. On one hand, domestic industry and oil based upstream projects will be financed and on other hand, preventive care will be taken to resist the entry of foreign companies to disturb the development of the industry in Iran. If Tehran gains more financial strength with the sound infrastructure to trade with international companies, Iran must have more growth oriented opportunities to participate in the international affairs. Rouhani’s interest in pluralistic theories to changer the framework of the conservative society in Iran for progression, economic liberty as well as the modernization was appreciated by his cabinet ministry. In pluralistic setting, monopoly is minimized by enhancing the solid uniformity in the diversity. So, the main agenda of Rouhani is to mobilize the economic independence and faster business expansion to reinforce the domestic financial sectors. So, Rouhani accepts new economic reform.
Iran’s Role to Tackle ISIS – Iran’s Visibility in Global Politics Becoming Prominent
Iran’s participation in the mission of global insurgency removal is increasing its value. Especially, Iran’s contribution to supply weapons to Kurds to fight with ISIS terrorists is a turning point for Tehran to expose its muscle power in the world. The racial profiling in Syria, Iraq, and Israel is endangering the world. Iran boosts up Kurds and many anti-ISIS rebels to launch more productive attacks to stop insurgency. Recently, America has minimized the restrictions to help Tehran to go for nuclear experiments. After probing, Pentagon has decided to wipe out all obligations to allow Iranian scientists to use Uranium to do experiments for better purposes. So, gradually, Iran is ensuring its presence in the international politics. Truly speaking, Rouhani’s openness theory in the matter of economic liberation and more flexibility in international diplomacy will certainly process several problem solving mechanisms to remove communal tension in Middle East. For example, the dispute between Ankara and Tehran seems to be ultra-light because of Rouhani’s liberal thoughts for innovation and power rebalancing. Turkey and Iran will sit for constructive futuristic table work to reduce the hidden repercussion in Gulf.
To end, a simple prediction can be made easily about the future of Iran. Israel suspects that Tehran will certainly manufacture nuclear bomb to destroy any big city in West as well as in Israel. In this case, US must be held much more responsible for catastrophic disorder. However, in spite of growing threat from Tehran, US administration is not much serious. White House lifted the ban on Iranian nuclear tests. In addition, Iran has also been given legal permission to export oil and gas to foreign countries. So, Iran, Iraq and other OPEC nations have much liberty in international trading. Simultaneously, Iran is placing more counter suggestions to have authoritative power in maximizing its presence in the international politics.